Advertisement
Advertisement
-
Re: The Supreme Court on the EPA & CO2...
Tue, April 3, 2007 - 7:22 AMSooner or later I will read the decision.
I am troubles that the media is touting the notion that the court made scientific findings - which on it's face sounds very unlike the Court. -
-
Re: The Supreme Court on the EPA & CO2...
Tue, April 3, 2007 - 12:56 PMA ruling based on scientific evidence is valid none-a-less -- but it should not be the sole factor for this ruling...
-
Re: The Supreme Court on the EPA & CO2...
Tue, April 3, 2007 - 5:11 PMThe ruling wasn't based on scientific findings. It was partly a states rights cases against the EPA.
It was a long term win for anti-global warming actions. States can now sue the EPA because they aren't doing their job. *cough* Bush.
www.nytimes.com/2007/04/03...scotus.html -
-
Re: The Supreme Court on the EPA & CO2...
Wed, April 4, 2007 - 12:18 PMThe case had elements of CO2 science behind their argument towards regulation and others as well... -
-
Re: The Supreme Court on the EPA & CO2...
Wed, April 4, 2007 - 12:44 PMTrue. However the ruling in no way affirmed or denied the role of human CO2 emissions on global climate change or warming. -
-
Re: The Supreme Court on the EPA & CO2...
Wed, April 4, 2007 - 12:48 PMThat much is quite true -- this was not a ruling on the subject Global Warming itself...
-
-
-
-
