• Schr...

  

  83

  Re: The Supreme Court on the EPA & CO2...

  Tue, April 3, 2007 - 7:22 AM

  Sooner or later I will read the decision.
  I am troubles that the media is touting the notion that the court made scientific findings - which on it's face sounds very unlike the Court.

  join to post
• • Froz...

    

    305

    Re: The Supreme Court on the EPA & CO2...

    Tue, April 3, 2007 - 12:56 PM

    A ruling based on scientific evidence is valid none-a-less -- but it should not be the sole factor for this ruling...

    join to post
  • Jon

    

    32

    Re: The Supreme Court on the EPA & CO2...

    Tue, April 3, 2007 - 5:11 PM

    The ruling wasn't based on scientific findings. It was partly a states rights cases against the EPA.
    
    It was a long term win for anti-global warming actions. States can now sue the EPA because they aren't doing their job. *cough* Bush.
    
    
    www.nytimes.com/2007/04/03...scotus.html

    join to post
  • • Froz...

      

      305

      Re: The Supreme Court on the EPA & CO2...

      Wed, April 4, 2007 - 12:18 PM

      The case had elements of CO2 science behind their argument towards regulation and others as well...

      join to post
    • • Jon

        

        32

        Re: The Supreme Court on the EPA & CO2...

        Wed, April 4, 2007 - 12:44 PM

        True. However the ruling in no way affirmed or denied the role of human CO2 emissions on global climate change or warming.

        join to post
      • • Froz...

          

          305

          Re: The Supreme Court on the EPA & CO2...

          Wed, April 4, 2007 - 12:48 PM

          That much is quite true -- this was not a ruling on the subject Global Warming itself...

          join to post

Topic	Author	Replies	Last Post
Hey Gerbil:	Schrödinger'...	10	September 8, 2009
HEY~!! You Scalia haters~!! Did you know that	Schrödinger'...	1	May 27, 2009
Souter is stepping down...	Frozenstars	0	May 3, 2009
Car Searches in NJ clarified	Schrödinger'...	0	March 12, 2009